Unchurched
Unchurched
By: tomvermillion.com, Categories: church, 1 comment

In America today, any number of individuals who identify themselves as Christians are not affiliated with any local church. Their typical response to questions about their non-affiliation is simply that you can be a Christian without going to church or having any real connection to a local church. Some are part of the “electronic church” who watch their favorite evangelist on Sunday mornings or early weekdays and, perhaps, send in a donation from time to time. Others have been “wounded” by the actions of some in a church and so stay away from all churches. A third group has been disappointed in churches and felt that the churches they were involved in were missing the mark and were not spiritual enough. Those individuals tend to reject the organized American church as being unbiblical in some way and have settled into small house churches or family churches. They may visit local churches from tome to time to connect with people they know but still hold some disdain for the church. My question is, “Are these believers hearing from God in their rejection of church involvement?” I’m not using “church” here in the sense of the universal body of Christ, but rather of local congregations made up of segments of the body of Christ.

 

This discussion came up in my men’s group this morning so I reflected on it during the day. I think it may be an important question because so many believers feel no need for involvement in a church or, in fact, oppose involvement in anything that looks like a traditional church. I know I risk alienating some folks who fall into these categories (some of which are long time friends), but I want to share my thoughts on that.

 

First of all local, organized churches were God’s idea. The church at Jerusalem was by all definitions a mega-church the day the doors opened. Three thousand members became part of the church after Peter’s opening sermon and then grew exponentially from there. Churches were also identified and establishes in cities all over the Mediterranean – Ephesus, Corinth, Rome, Sardis, Laodecia, Antioch, etc. These churches had apostolic oversight, elders, deacons, evangelists, prophets and so forth. History, as well as the New Testament, tells us that they typically came together in one place on Sundays for communion, preaching, prophecy, revelation, and mutual encouragement and met in homes at other times. They had organized benevolence programs (Acts 6) and sent out and supported missionaries. They gave to the poor. They had conferences (Acts 15) and emphasized four things: the apostle’s teachings, communion, fellowship, and prayer (Acts 2:42). In other words, what those churches did under the direct oversight of the apostles was not so different from what most churches do today. My point is that God ordained local, organized churches.

 

The next question might be, “Okay, but can’t I just stay home and believe in God and Jesus and live a good life?” If you are asking whether or not you will go to hell if you don’t attend church regularly, I would say not because you didn’t attend church. If you are asking whether it is okay in the sight of God to stay home and be a spiritual “Lone Ranger,” I would definitely say “No!” The writer of Hebrews said, “Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another – and all the more as you see the Day approaching” (Heb.11:25).

 

In addition to that admonition, in the New Testament there are a number of passages often referred to as the “one another passages.” They command things such as love one another, encourage one another, serve one another, pray for one another, teach one another, accept one another, admonish one another, and forgive one another. If we are not in fellowship with other believers and intentionally doing life together, those verses have little meaning. John tells us, “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen” (1 Jn. 4:20). If you love someone you do not break off fellowship with them or abandon them by choosing to disconnect from God’s church. Some may respond that even though they don’t go to church they still have Christian friends that they love. Jesus said that even unbelievers love those who love them. Loving the unlovable is a mark of the true body of Christ. You definitely get that opportunity in churches, but not so much when you pick and choose those with whom you fellowship.

 

Thirdly, Lone Rangers and small house churches that reject organized churches rarely grow or turn the world upside down. They violate the “body principle” of First Corinthians. In chapter 12, Paul likens the church to a human body in which God has created different parts with different functions – each contributing to the welfare of the other parts. In chapters 12 and 14 he discusses spiritual gifts distributed by the Holy Spirit. He says that the Spirit gives different gifts to different people but all are to be exercised for building up the body of Christ and one another. God has created his church to be interdependent on one another – not self-sufficient. There is a synergism when the body with all its parts and gifts operate together. Individual believers or a few meeting in a house loose that synergism and rob God of a great deal of fruit that could have been born if they were working in tandem with large numbers of believers.

 

Finally, many will argue that they are not involved in a church because today’s churches have so many problems and are often “unspiritual.” Are you kidding me?! No one can top the church at Corinth for problems and a lack of spirituality. Leaf through Paul’s first letter. He calls them carnal not spiritual. He deals with divisions in the church, cliques based on spiritual pride, tolerating open immorality, lawsuits among believers, unhealthy marriages, issues with idolatry, abuse of the Lord’s supper, the misuse of spiritual gifts, disorderly worship and a total misunderstanding of the resurrection and end times. Yet he calls them the church of God at Corinth and those sanctified to be holy. This messy congregation was still part of the bride of Christ and loved by God. Nowhere does Paul suggest that the truly spiritual or wounded should jump ship and leave the church to create a their own personal church or watch church on television. God’s church has never been perfect. His will is for his people to stay, forgive if needed, continue to love God by loving his people, and be part of the solution rather than running away.

 

On top of that, as believers, we are in a war. Soldiers separated from the main body while in enemy territory are a great risk. If they have left the ranks on their own, they are no longer under authority so they have little or none of their own with which to face the devil.

 

I am not saying that once you are part of a congregation you should never leave. Sometimes God is calling you to another part of the body. There are congregations that are toxic. The message is not to give up on church in general or to isolate yourself from other believers. The message is not to give up on God’s ordained plan for the body of Christ simply because it is imperfect. God ordained marriage. We don’t give up on the institution simply because marriages are imperfect. If you have gone from church to church to church and find all of them intolerable then, perhaps, you have developed a spiritual cynicism that keeps you from seeing the good in any church. You may want to pray about that. God wants every believer connected in meaningful ways to many other believers for their own sake and for the sake of the kingdom. It’s not okay to be disconnected so if you have been out for a while, you may want to reconnect. Ask God to lead you.

 

 

 

1 Comment

  • While your premise is correct that the Lord, through the inspiration of his Spirit, brought the early believers the understanding of the nature of the Church, there are some misunderstandings here. Firstly, the early church as never a ‘Mega Church’ even though 3000 were added at Pentecost. The Judean believers were outcast form the outset for following Jesus. We see evidence of this in Scriptures even as early as Acts chapters 4-8. They therefore met in homes and other public places they could. The use a word mega-church is really reading something ‘into’. The practice of meeting in homes continued into the days of Paul and certainly continued after Nero’s persecution in 64AD. What is true in your premise is that the apostles and Paul in particular did set up elders and deacons as part of the leadership to govern the Church and preserve apostolic teaching. Bye the way Paul only advocated male leadership. I know this may be hard for some women pastors to accept. Here I am not trying to sexist of controversial but true Pauline teaching epistles.

    What you may be experiencing in USA may be symptomatic of all Mega Churches – they tend to become big corporations focused on building programmes, tithes and living a bless life, rather than teaching on surrendering one’s life and consecrating all to God under the leadership of Jesus first and fore most and working this out in the home, work place and the local congregation.. Possibly the Gospel that is being preached in USA is so watered down that pastors themselves are not really living sacrificial lives which is obvious to those of are leaving their Churches.

    I have been a Church goer all my life and firmly believe in the all Born-again Christians who confess Jesus as Lord should to attend a local Church. However, would I advice them to find a Church where the minister understands expository preaching, and is properly trained and called into the ministry. He must demonstrate genuine love for his congregation and not promote self-interest. I have also observed when the congregations grow beyond 350-400 it is difficult for one pastor and the eldership to care for all members, therefore it is better for them to plant a Church rather than grow a mega-structure. This is also a far better strategy to spread the Gospel.

    This short reply is not to meant to criticise but provoke thought. Is the mega Church concept truly a New Testament observation? I think not. A cursory review of the first 300 years of the Church up until Constantine (312 AD) will show us that local congregations were not ‘mega’ in size. However, I appreciate your concern about ‘satellite’ Christians that orbit local congregations but never commit to any. Possibly, Church leaders should examine themselves in humility before the Lord and ask why people are leaving their fellowship. My message to Church leaders and myself, is love the people as Christ loved the Church and serve them. Expend yourself on their behalf. Scrap the big building programmes – the leisure centres, retreats etc. and spend more on the poor, missions and supporting of the persecuted brethren in Islamic countries and the people will remain faithful because there your find the presence of the Lord Jesus.

    Shalom in Jesus

    Jimmy